Feb
26
2010

Ex-Classification Board Member Issues Pro R18+ Response

pimg hspace=5 align=left src=http://www.theeca.com/newsletters/lightBulb.jpg alt= /A former member of Australiarsquo;s Classification Board has submitted an incredibly well-written and reasoned response to the government issued Discussion Paper, regarding the topic of adding an R18+ rating category for games.br /br /The 17-page response (a href=http://www.igea.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/MLCS-Management-R18+-Submission.pdfPDF/a) was crafted by Paul J Hunt, who served as Deputy Director of the Classification Board and as a senior executive with the Office of Film and Literature Classification. He also lists himself as a ldquo;parent of teenagers who play computer games and a child of ldquo;Seniorsrdquo; who play computer games.rdquo;br /br /Hunt begins his argument by imparting first-hand knowledge into the current problems with the rating system:/pblockquotepWhen I made a decision, or participated in a decision, that a computer game was unsuitable for minors, I was forced to refuse classification for that game. It was not because I thought that the game depicted, expressed or otherwise dealt with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that it would offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults. It was simply because the game was not OK for kids.br /br /Not being able to restrict computer games to adults was an impediment to my ability to reflect Australian community standards./p/blockquotepHunt offers another real example of how the lack of an R18+ rating affects gamers, comparing the rating of the movie Hannibal (rated R18+) and Grand Theft Auto III (which was Refused Classification). Hunt notes that, in the example, ldquo;hellip;two products received different results, but both were assessed as suitable for the same adult audience. That the result does not reflect community standards is evident in the massive number of complaintshellip; received by the OFLC regarding both the RC decision.rdquo;br /br /A few more choice points from Hunt:/pblockquotepSome parents are irresponsible with the management of their childrenrsquo;s behaviour. If the reason for excluding an R18+ classification for games is to limit the access of the children of incompetent or irresponsible parents, then we should ban R18+ films, restricted publications, alcohol, cigarettes, etc. from our society./p/blockquoteblockquotepThere have been suggestions that an R18+ classification would include ldquo;sexual abuse, criminal activity, and extreme violencerdquo;. The guidelines do not permit their existence in the R18+ category./p/blockquotepHunt addressed some of his responses directly to South Australian Attorney General Michael Atkinsonrsquo;s claims that nobody cares about the R18+ issue, except for gamers:/pblockquotepOf even greater concern is the fact that Mr. Atkinson does not understand that most Australians are gamers, and therefore the majority of the population is familiar with game content./ppnbsp;/ppAll responses, including those from gamers, are responses from the Australian community. Whilst Mr. Atkinson may wish to marginalise gamers, and put down the knowledge of all Australians, I trust the Government will accept all submissions at face value as representative of the Australian communityrsquo;s feelings on this issue./p/blockquotepHunt concludes by using a href=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/02/02/south-australia-suppresses-online-comments-repentsAtkinsonrsquo;s own words/a against him:/pblockquotepThere is a need to follow South Australian Attorney General Michael Atkinsonrsquo;s advice on a recent similar issue regarding the rights and freedoms of Australians ndash; an attempt to restrict political comment on the internet: quot;When one gets public opinion wrong, as I did, one has to change one’s mind.quot;/p/blockquotepHunt is now Principal Consultant for a href=http://mlcs.com.auMLCS Management/a, a company that offers assistance with quot;classification services,quot; such as pre-classification advice and help with the management of appeals./ppbr /emThanks Ryan!/em/p

Like this? Then visit the blog it came from – there’s lots more content just like it! :)

Written by Staff in: Uncategorized |

No Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

adsense

Cool-O-Rama: News for Geeks